Stanislaus

Hectolitres of digital/artificial blood, tons of slow motion shots, a woman's breast from time to time, a bunch of half-naked guys, a WTF shot here and there - this and more sort of summarizes the second 300, which is in many ways similar, if not the same as the first one. Halfway through the film I thought it was really boring, but fortunately it all picks up somewhat in the second half, so this film deserves the three stars I gave it. Of the cast, I was most impressed by Eva Green, whose villain role fit her like a glove. In short, a film that takes a special approach to appreciate, I enjoyed the many visual effects and had a satisfying soundtrack playing in my ears.

Since I haven't read the book, I relied mostly on what the trailers showed, which really got me hooked. Personally, I love the sci-fi genre and I adore Kate Winslet, so I absolutely had to see Divergence. And I have to say, I got a pretty solidly made film with a likeable cast, a good story and an unforgettable soundtrack. In short, a movie that gave me exactly what I expected from it, so I was satisfied.

I don't like Russell Brand at all, but he was the perfect choice to play the simple-minded Arthur. I also liked the female cast featuring Helen Mirren and Jennifer Garner. As far as the story is concerned, it is not an original gem, but on the other hand, the plot moved along, I was not bored, so just a clean average that does not offend. In short, an unpretentious and relaxing film that was well suited for a long bus journey.

Horrible Bosses has a quite original primary idea, but the execution was unfortunately average, which is a pity, because the potential was there. The cast wasn't bad at all, but it just lacked something. All in all, a nice and unpretentious film that didn't entertain me as much as I originally thought it would, but then again, it didn't offend me either.

Prophecy stands out as a horror film mainly due to the fairly well done monsters, considering the year it was produced, in addition to referencing the thorny issue of ecology in the form of the environmental impact of polluted water. The film doesn't lack tension in the scary scenes, but on the other hand there aren’t that many of them, which is a shame in a horror film. In short, an average film that can still appeal even in the age of computer effects because of its subject mater.

I saw Prey and Chaw at almost the same time, both of which are horror films with bloodthirsty wild boars that feasted on more than just animal flesh. When I compare them, they each struck me as something different. The South Korean Chaw mixes horror and (un)intentional humour and it shows the monster in its full glory and it looks decent. Prey, in contrast, doesn’t show much of the monster, it’s more hints and snouts, but it did get me interested in its story. Together with the dangerous animals, there are also family issues being dealt with, which at first glance doesn't lend itself to a horror film, but in this case it was also the driving force behind the plot, so it wasn't too distracting. I liked the music, which complemented the visuals perfectly. In short, a decently made film that benefits from atmosphere and a minimum number oi characters.

If you make a film that is full of religious themes, you have to expect negative reviews, and Noah is a prime example of that. I was used to getting powerful and evocative dramas that could tear me apart, were made on lower budgets, from Darren Aronofsky, so I was very excited to see Noah, which in many ways is a departure from the director's previous films. I'm a non-believer and only superficially familiar with biblical stories, so Aronofsky could have shown me what he wanted and I would have bought it. Personally, I was quite surprised by the presence of stone giants, which had a purposeful use in the story. The narrative was a bit chaotic at times as it jumped from topic to topic, but it wasn't that distracting. The cast was likeable, the visual effects were of a high standard, which is expected of a film like this, and Clint Mansell's music seemed to me to complement rather than stand out (like in Requiem for a Dream). All in all, a film that could have been better, I admit, but I personally enjoyed it, so as a viewer I'm happy with the overall result.

Conversations with an immortal and unsuspecting mother. Constant verbal fights, bickering and innuendo of the sharpest calibre. Reassurance about the condition of an ancient pet. Repeated introductions to an old girlfriend. I could certainly go on like this for a while, listing elements that appear in virtually every episode of this incredibly funny British sitcom. The cast is absolutely perfect – Ian McKellen and Derek Jacobi are very convincing, Frances de la Tour is every inch the boozy and flirtatious comedian, and the hitherto unknown to me Iwan Rheon also pleasantly surprised me. This immensely likeable quartet is complemented by other funny supporting characters who entertain as much as the protagonists. For some it may be a repetition of the same thing, over and over again, but for me it works because I am royally entertained and laughing almost continuously. In short, an excellent, endlessly entertaining and very well cast sitcom that really sat well with me.

The South Korean style of acting can always take my breath away because I never know whether to laugh, cry or just roll my eyes. This is exactly the case in Chaw, however here I was more focused on the bloodthirsty monster in the form of a gigantic boar that attacked almost everything and everyone in its vicinity. The look of the beast was quite good, I must commend it, because many similar films portray all sorts of monsters in a terribly unrealistic way. As far as the story is concerned, it's average, but I liked the atmosphere, maybe also because of the wacky acting. In short, a horror film that is often balanced by comic elements, whether intentional or unintentional, but it’s nothing to write home about.

A-B-C-D... – so goes the nursery rhyme, but this bloody anthology film is definitely not for a young audience. The quality of the each story varies widely, from decent to utter garbage. I was most impressed by the letters S (Speed), K (Klutz) and T (Toilet). The worst, most embarrassing, or gratuitously gory stories were letters F (Fart), H (Hydro-electric Diffusion), and Z (Zetsumetsu). All in all, when I add it all up and scratched my head, it was a rather below average affair that I came to by sheer chance via a director whose short frankly disappointed me.