Realização:
Andy SerkisArgumento:
Kelly MarcelCâmara:
Robert RichardsonMúsica:
Marco BeltramiElenco:
Tom Hardy, Michelle Williams, Woody Harrelson, Naomie Harris, Stephen Graham, Reid Scott, Sean Delaney, Laurence Spellman, Etienne Vick, Amber Sienna (mais)Streaming (2)
Sinopses(1)
Tom Hardy returns to the big screen as the lethal protector Venom, one of Marvel’s greatest and most complex characters. Directed by Andy Serkis, Screenplay by Kelly Marcel with the Story by Tom Hardy & Kelly Marcel, the film also stars Michelle Williams, Naomie Harris and Woody Harrelson, in the role of the villain Cletus Kasady/Carnage. (Sony Pictures Home Entertainment)
(mais)Críticas (9)
O segundo filme é mais sobre digi-monstros do que de Hardy. Além disso, sobre dois digi- monstros que ficariam iguais num filme a preto e branco. Por outro lado, Venom «nos seus dois pés» é divertido e a sua visita à festa é um dos melhores momentos. Os vilões não provocam muito medo, as suas motivações são mal-feitas e as suas interações com o seu meio ambiente não são nada sérias. Como várias coisas no filme. No escuro final do digifest exagerado, não me podia importar menos com quem atirava quem para onde e o que caía para onde. De resto, Hardy numa motocicleta é fantástico, e Michelle Williams... Michelle Williams! Ela acrescenta esse elemento único de estética muito necessário. Se não estivesse lá ela, eu dava duas estrelas.
()
Um filme que foi criado apenas por causa da cena depois dos créditos finais e do dinheiro... Em Hollywood, há habilidosos diretores com visão, prometedoras estrelas em ascensão, artesãos comuns e, por outro lado, gente rotinada abaixo da média que nem sequer tem capacidade de fazê-lo como deve ser, mas que não discutem com o estúdio. E Andy Serkis agora faz parte do último grupo. Venom: Tempo de Carnificina é um filme de banda desenhada saído de um molde que não o vai entreter devido ao argumento gasto, um desempenho entediante dos atores e uma montagem caótica. Tudo isso é obviamente condicionado pela classificação PG-13, e assim, durante o filme, várias vezes não se tem a certeza de como este ou aquele personagem realmente terminou, porque tudo é cortado de forma tão "segura" que os espetadores acabam por não saber de nada. E como comédia é totalmente infantil. Não consigo imaginar que os autores envolvidos tenham aceitado fazê-lo por outra razão que não fosse o cheque dos honorários.
()
If I were to write that the Venom 2 was as uninteresting and unimaginative as the first one, I'd be bullshitting, because I don't remember anything from the first. But it's certainly uninteresting and uninspired. Tom Hardy's cool, so is Woody Harrelson. Michelle Williams and Naomie Harris are solid actresses, but they're given little space. In fact, everything has a little space. Venom isn't even a hundred minutes long, and unfortunately a good third of the running time is taken up by weird sitcom outtakes about Eddie Brock and Venom's cohabitation, where the film tries to pretend it's a variation on The Odd Couple, only with an alien. Occasionally, the film remembers that it has a serial killer and his symbiotic friend in there, so it skips to a random action scene and try to pretend to be horror. For an hour, nothing interesting actually happens except for Venom and Brock's arguments mixed with Harrelson's overacting (you can’t play a deranged serial killer in such a small space in any other way), only to end with a final clash with a lot of pretty solid visual effects and an unexpectedly solid length. And then the end. I won't remember any of it in a week. Again.
()
I was a little afraid of this movie. Mainly because I was worried that everything would be in the same spirit as the first part. And that's exactly how it is. It's all about Tom Hardy again. Venom is still at a level where I don't really know if I should be a fan of him or not. The main antagonist played by Woody Harrelson is also completely unnecessary. When I saw the first part, I took it with a grain of salt, at least I laughed. But I also missed the humor a bit here and not to mention the digital effects, which are too artificial. A cheaper version of the Marvel universe, which is noticeable.
()
Venom 2 is such a disappointment that I feel like giving it 2 stars, but that would be biased, so a neutral 3 with a bitter taste in my mouth and an exclamation point for next time. Venom was a pleasant surprise, maybe because Ruben Fleischer was in charge of it, and he was able to handle the humour (Zombieland) and the action (Gangster Squad). Unfortunately, the sequel is directed by Andy Serkis (who has only done Mowgli) and suddenly the humour and action stops working. Tom Hardy is surprisingly unlikeable in this film and I didn’t enjoy his role at all, he's not funny or interesting, he doesn't show anything in action, in short a useless, uninteresting and boring character, and Woody Harrelson, whom I generally like, also didn't show much of anything – their dialogue exchanges are uninteresting and I didn't enjoy listening to them at all, I silently remembered the dialogue from Bond, yes, a strange comparison, but when they give dialogue clashes between two great actors, let me feel the intense darkness in the air, not these childish exchanges. Humour could have been a strong point, but I only laughed once in the whole film and that was with Venom at the disco, the rest is infantile and you don’t even smile. Nobody laughed at all in the cinema, so it's not just me. The Gore is missing of course, but I counted on it. The visuals and the effects are inoffensive, but definitely not breathtaking. Shortening the film to 90 minutes hurts the the film because it practically has no story and everything is rushed. On the other hand, if ti was two hours long, I probably wouldn’t last, because Venom 2 is not very entertaining. And now about the action. There are two short action scenes that end before they even start and then a half hour finale that I won't tell you anything about because I was asleep with boredom, so I'll have to recap that sometime. Anyway, going into Venom thinking it was a comic book action flick and leaving as bored and frazzled as a two-hour Drama, I didn't expect that in the slightest. Ironically, the post-credit scene is better than the movie itself. Story 2/5, Action 3/5, Humor 2/5, Violence 0/5, Fun 3/5 Music 3/5, Visuals 4/5, Atmosphere 3/5, Suspense 2/5, Emotion 1/5, Actors 3/5. 5/10.
()
Venom as a pro-migrant agitator and declared bisexual is the surprising revelation of this sequel. Nevertheless, Let There Be Carnage is a tiny bit better than part one. It passes by nicely and is funny in its silly way and its running time is short. As if Serkis simply cut the boring and unfunny bits out. Some of the twists and revelations appear very farfetched and all-of-a-sudden. Stress is on the marital quarrels of the continuously weirdly acting Hardy along with Venom, and all the other things surrounding this just happen to happen, god knows how. It lacks any logic. And it would just be a waste of time to go into analysis of degradation when compared to the source material. P.S.: Harrelson spends his time strangely overacting; this role is acutely uncomfortable for him.
()
A bit better than last time, mainly thanks to great villains. Woody Harrelson and Naomie Harris are like Bonnie and Clyde, only crazier, their escape is one of the best comic book movie scenes in recent memory in my opinion, and while I often grumble about unnecessarily long movies, this time a few extra dozen minutes would have been easily tolerable, if it had been devoted mostly to them. Otherwise, Andy Serkis didn't bring anything new to the director's chair, but he did a good job. Marco Beltrami composed unfortunately similarly bland music as Ludwig Göransson before him, and Tom Hardy, the good actor, once again seemed to forget that he can act, and once again he goofs off (although, admittedly, a little less than four years ago).
()
Venom 2 is a perfect example of a one-off action flick. Story-wise, it doesn't have much to surprise – except perhaps, if I'm getting ahead of myself, the post-credit scene – and with a relatively short running time, there's not really much room for any plot-twists (except maybe one tiny one). The film relies mainly on action, light (black-and-red) humour and the interaction between the two "aliens", which doesn't always work. The character of Frances "Banshee" Barrison was largely underused, which is a shame. A brisk, perhaps a bit too digital in places for (really) just one viewing!
()
I don't even want to get too much into this movie because I'd feel like I was kicking a disabled person. It's actually fascinating to watch a $110M piece of work that seems like every other scene was being concocted while the previous one was being filmed. An Olympics of the laziest screenwriting ("the governor of California decided to bring back the death penalty in light of these crimes" what the fuck?!). Kelly Marcel's role in Hollywood is to be given potentially problematic topics and then muddle them up in a way that doesn't offend anyone while still trying to appear superficially non-conformist. I don't know if they have no one better at Sony to do that, or if they just can't completely colonize certain topics, but nothing here holds together at all.
()
Publicidade