Realização:
Keola RacelaCâmara:
John Wakayama CareyMúsica:
Carla PatulloElenco:
Evan Daves, Jillian Mueller, Katelyn Pearce, Larry Saperstein, Robbie Tann, Glenn Stott, Blake FrenchStreaming (1)
Sinopses(1)
Abe is a burgeoning perv with a guilty conscience. Todd is Abe’s spazzed out BFF and partner in grime. Chaz is a girl with a boy’s name who hides her feelings behind a thick layer of goth eyeliner. Ricky is the star jock with a secret in his pants he dare not expose. What these uptight dweebs could never have guessed is that the wholesome movie theater they work at used to have a lot more than just gum stuck to the seats. When a remnant of the theater’s porno past surfaces, the kids are visited by a sex demon that gives them a taste of the dark side. (South by Southwest Film Festival)
(mais)Críticas (3)
Porno is the epitome of scriptwriting gone wrong. Every character is horrendously clichéd, making them unbearable and cringeworthy. Their painfully dull interactions almost drove me to chew through my own wrists. The film's runtime is unnecessarily long given its boring plot — most of it is filled with tedious and unfunny dialogues where the main idiots incessantly debate what's acceptable in Christianity. The provocative title might attract viewers, only for them to realize it's a relatively tame affair, packed with awkward nonsense and lackluster execution. It barely earns one star if that. I'm not even sure what for. Maybe for the impressive depiction of a mutilated penis... maybe.
()
Apesar do título tentador e do excitante tema sobre os empregados adolescentes do cinema que, no início dos anos 90, acidentalmente descobrem uma película amaldiçoada com conteúdo pornográfico e invocam um demónio sexual feminino ao exibi-lo, este é um filme de terror relativamente virgem e moral de comédia, cuja mensagem consiste em que a pornografia é maléfica e que os fornicários correm o risco de uma devastação genital brutal (que se pode apreciar de perto numa cena). Os personagens principais mal escritos e irritantes são membros da juventude cristã que quase se cruzam ao verem um cartaz lascivo, e o filme baseia-se mais nos seus diálogos do que em cenas de exploração, mas é aborrecido, sem graça, sem ideais, e incapaz de fazer qualquer uso estimulante dos temas da época em oferta, tais como a atitude pré-Internet em relação à pornografia e homossexualidade como algo antinatural. Lixo não engraçado no qual realmente não valem os poucos segundos de seios nus.
()
There is a rather fertile subject matter buried deep in this movie somewhere, although it is not anything that we could not get out of some other movies (Lamberto Bava’s Demons especially comes to mind), but it could still be at least a well-made horror B-movie. However, due to the tiresome and worn-out screenplay, plus the completely incompetent directing, this is almost an unwatchable affair. They attempted to produce a movie, that at the start was supposed to be a mash-up of horror and comedy, but by the end it just did not matter anymore, because it is simply utterly tedious and garrulous rubbish for Christian youth with a stupidly puritanical message that pornography is evil. However, despite that, there are hardly any explicit scenes in the movie, so the sensational title is just a kind of lure for the audience. It was quite an ordeal to finish watching this. [Sitges 2019]
()