Realização:
Tom SixArgumento:
Tom SixCâmara:
David MeadowsMúsica:
James Edward BarkerElenco:
Laurence R. Harvey, Ashlynn Yennie, Maddi Black, Kandace Caine, Peter Charlton, Peter BlankensteinSinopses(1)
After being banned in the UK, the wait is over for the most controversial movie of the year, Tom Six's follow-up to his original cult horror smash: THE HUMAN CENTIPEDE 2 (FULL SEQUENCE)! The opening night selection of Fantastic Fest 2011, the film ups the ante with a brute force unparalleled in motion pictures today. The iconic Dr. Heiter has inspired a real-life protege, the sickly, disturbed security guard Martin - who takes his gory inspiration from the original film to horrific new extremes--and one-ups the doctor with his piece de resistance, a 12-person human centipede of his own. Ashlynn Yennie, star of The Human Centipede (First Sequence), returns in this no-holds-barred assault on the senses that pushes the limits. (texto oficial do distribuidor)
(mais)Críticas (5)
A segunda Centopéia Humana do extremista Tom Six preenche um pouco um buraco na história cinematográfica. Ele quebra tabus (grávida, bebé) e leva a notável ideia do primeiro filme a um tal extremo que só o ignorante (e ignorante do subgénero «splatter») não apreciará a sua capacidade de introduzir sem elementos de humor uma fusão de elementos de horror e violência e repugnância suprema numa forma tão surrealista e cómica. Ele não é um jovem Peter Jackson; em comparação, ele não consegue levar coisas com calma. Mas como o seu produto está longe dos parâmetros de trash na sua forma profissional e o personagem principal parece ser realista, o seu arrepio e a sua malícia vão perturbá-lo em lugares sensíveis e anteriormente intocados da mente. Mas é claro que tem de ser o público alvo certo. Já na adolescência, filmes como Holocausto Canibal, Pink Flamingos e NEKROmantik deixaram-me curioso sobre as mentes dos seus realizadores — o que faziam, porquê e como. E na constante inundação de Hollywood, eu estava entretido pela sua alteridade. Gostei igualmente da segunda Centopéia Humana, mais madura na realização de filmes e na representação do que a primeira parte, não aborrecida por um momento e cheia de ideias que se mantêm unidas e se formam para o «grande final».
()
Has Tom Six made a filthy meta horror film about how harmless perverts can become dangerous psychopaths after watching a filthy horror film? Probably not, because the last scene (i.e. the most cliché twist ever) allows for a completely opposite interpretation. I’d probably be one of the few who liked more the first and tighter part. It was more about the victims, I was able to relate to them and was mentally tramped by their sad fate. The second part, in contrast, moves only around the perverted protagonists and we don’t get to know anything about the victims. The first part is better as horror with a story, the second is more a probe into perverted thoughts, and I’m not saying that this is bad, it’s just that personally it doesn’t suit me. Martin (the protagonist) is portrayed very convincingly repulsive, which is one of the things that both parts have in common – Tom Six has a good nose for proper perverts. The rest of the actors, on the other hand, aren’t that good, and the film is not particularly well made, either, though the way it relies on brutality and nastiness it’s effective. So, four stars, but not as certain as the first part. PS: If the third part is to be even more meta, maybe some outraged film critic will sew together director Tom Six, Dieter Laser (Dr. Helter from the first part) and Laurence R. Harvey (Martin from the second part). I will give it five stars if it’s shot even worse :-D Edit: I’m reducing the rating to 3 stars, the memories of the film fizzled out surprisingly quickly.
()
If the first episode was an innocent first date with a slightly peculiar partner, I would call the second one an outright fuckfest with the most disgusting sexual deviant imaginable. And if the first film – intimate, psychologically believable and emotionally quite intense – gave me the impression that Tom Six can weave stories, the second convincingly disabused me of that belief. The Second Human Centipede is admittedly brilliantly atmospheric, optimally morbid in its setting and main characters, even in the scenes free of physical violence, and boasts an extremely realistic psychopath whose daily life alone would make for quite a few horror films. But all the promising themes merge into a mindless carnage of such a disgusting and exaggerated nature that the only real emotion that remains is utter disgust, not at the actions of the "hero" (which was clearly the purpose), but at the actions of the director, who has the audacity to serve us civilized people such cheap and mindless filth. In addition to being supremely ugly, the film is also unimaginably nonsensical in terms of narrative logic – even a film primarily built on brutality shouldn’t have so many flaws and logical holes – and even Six's hilarious attempt to enrich the narrative with a noble twist fails to cover those flaws up. I finished watching it out of pure curiosity as to how far the filmmakers were willing to go in their visual openness, and I can honestly say that they went so far as to make the film worthy of being banned. This is not normal, really.
()
This is the inevitable consequence of the great success that followed the release of the first movie. Tom Six unleashed his perverted imagination and gave fans what they wanted. A severely harsh and faecal piggy bank without any real story was created, which many people will probably enjoy, and a large number of other people will completely condemn with undisguised disgust. For me, this is exactly the kind of fringe movie entertainment I am not really into, and I do not need to watch it ever again.
()
Martin isn't a sophisticated lunatic like Doctor Heiter. He's just a small, chubby man who struggles with his victims dying, can't operate, gets frustrated by it, and his loved ones don't help him much. Eventually, though, he will succeed. So how is the new installment different? Is it better? First of all, the centipede is significantly longer now because it now has ten segments. Secondly, it shows, at least initially, how much the media can influence us. Is this what the film is trying to tell us? Or is it all just about the nastiness that it’s trying to shock us with?
()
Publicidade